Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web

UTA Football Vigil - "It's just a matter of time!"

Guest Book Welcome SLC  Links Blog Images

Over Five Years Since the Student Referendum Approved Football

In April 2004, UT Arlington students overwhelmingly voted in favor of reviving NCAA football and beginning Women's Soccer and Golf programs at The University of Texas at Arlington.  Despite this strong mandate, President Spaniolo decided the time was not right.  He felt a higher priority would be to get an arena built to replace Texas Hall as an athletic venue.  He said he wanted to re-examine the issue in five years, which will be in early 2010.  The text of President Spaniolo's announcement from January 20, 2005 was recently removed from the UTA.edu website.

Now that the Special Events Center is being built, is football getting closer to reality?

Wouldn't it be embarassing for UTA to be the last SLC school without football?

Questions or Comments? Join the utamavericks.com forum

Could we be approaching "Peak Internal Athletic Funding?"

In the world of NCAA Athletics, there are two sources of funding, internal and external.  Internal funding consists of student fees and other money generated within the institution.  External funding consists mainly of gifts from outside the university.  Most of the UTA athletics budget is derived from the student athletics fee, which is driven by the aggregate number of hours "sold" by the university each semester.  The amount of external giving is a reflection of the standing a university has in the community, especially among alumni.  Such is the case at UTA. 

Consistent with other non-football schools, UTA has a relatively negligible level of external athletic gifting occurring.  At schools where football has been introduced, as at Southeastern Louisiana University, external giving has grown rapidly, not just for athletics, but in general.  The cost argument against football thus appears to lack merit, and in fact, as rising tuition costs and stagnant enrollment growth put a ceiling on further internal funding growth, it is possible that football is the best potential future catalyst for external funding growth that could ensure the survival of existing Division 1 athletic teams at UTA.

Fortunately, we can look at several similar institutions that have recently added or upgraded their football programs, so there are solid facts available. Some of the schools that started or soon will start up football are SLU, Lamar, UTSA, University of South Alabama, Villanova, Hardin-Simmons, Mary Hardin Baylor and Birmingham Southern.  Schools that have moved up, like Connecticut, Central Arkansas, Troy, UCF, FIU, ULM and WKU spring to mind as well.  Clearly, we can afford to resurrect football. 

We could not have anticipated in 2004 that UTA would have the six natural gas wells on campus that have become our "overnight endowment."  Who would have predicted a $75 million dollar windfall?!?  This can't hurt.

If Lamar can do football, we certainly could do it.  What is needed is leadership and a vision for the future.